
425 Park Avenue; Photo by Flickr user d.guija
The competition to design a new tower for 425 Park Avenue is heating up. When we last wrote about it, proposals had been elicited from eleven architects, but now, seven of those firms have been eliminated from the running, leaving (surprise!) four Pritzker Prize winners in the competition.
As City Room reports, Zaha Hadid of Zaha Hadid Architects, Rem Koolhaas of OMA, Norman Foster of Foster & Partners, and Richard Rogers of Rogers Stirk Harbour & Partners each presented initial concepts to developer L&L Holding this week. These designs are expected to be released to the public in the coming weeks as an advisory committee headed by the director of Columbia’s Center for Urban Real Estate, Vishaan Chakrabarti begins to make decisions.
The site presents some unique challenges, especially with regards to the zoning regulations in place. The existing building, a bulky and not-so-tall High Modernism knock-off, sits just four blocks from Mies van der Rohe’s Seagram Building and three from Gordon Bunshaft’s Lever House. With a Floor-to-Area Ratio (FAR) of 18, the current building is larger than allowed for new buildings, which must be at FAR 15 or below. An arcane loophole, however, would allow the developer to build at FAR 18 if twenty-five percent of the existing structure is kept; this adds a lot of complication to any design process, starchitect or not.
This problem might be entirely avoided, though, as the Planning Commission is due to decide on a proposal to upzone the entire area surrounding Grand Central; in this scenario, 425 Park could be allowed to reach up to 21 FAR. Because of the uncertainty around the project, the developer has asked each of the four competing firms to submit designs for each of the possible scenarios at hand. In addition, the prospectus for the proposals said that, “While the client team is open-minded about material and aesthetic expression, a restrained elegance has often proven to be more successful for this building type than irrational exuberance.” This is developer-speak for ‘we don’t care what the design turns out to be, as long as the profit margin is wide enough.’
[via NYTimes City Room and A/N Blog]
more